Ragsdale v. Nagle
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment, of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to restrain the defendant from carrying on the business of searcher of records, or abstracter, in the county of Sonoma. An injunction as prayed for was issued by the trial court, and an appeal has been taken from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.
The cause of action is based upon a certain contract entered into between plaintiff and one Brown upon the one side, and defendant Nagle upon the other. At the date of the contract both plaintiff and defendant were engaged in the business of abstracting in the county of Sonoma, and, in consideration of the sum of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Brown v. KlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- General Paint Corp. v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Yost v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Akey v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Semple v. SchwarzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.