Wall v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Murray, County; T. P. Clay, Assigned Judge. Action by Thomas P. Wall against A. D. Chapman to restrain breach of contract of sale of business good will. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
Thomas P. Wall commenced this action in the district court of Murray county against A. D. Chapman to enjoin the defendant, Chapman, from engaging in the practicing of dentistry in the city of Sul-phur in violation of a written contract. The petition alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff is and has been engaged in the practice of dentistry in the city of Sulphur for more than ten years and on the 26th day of May, 1920, Chapman was likewise engaged in the practice of dentistry at Sulphur. That on said date the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract in consideration of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Threlkeld v. StewardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Shafer v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Akers v. RappeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Hulen v. EarelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3Cited by18 opinions
- Yost v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Akey v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Herrington v. HacklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Key v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Valley Mortuary v. FairbanksUtah Supreme Court · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.