State Ex Rel. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} When the government takes property, it must pay compensation. And taking isn’t limited to physical confiscation — it can also be by impairing the property’s value by, as here, cutting off access.
{¶ 2} In this case, the city of Cincinnati has denied access to a piece of property, leaving it landlocked — and not just figuratively, but literally: the only access would be by boat. Cincinnati not being Waterworld, boat access is not sufficient. Though the city makes a series of bizarre arguments attempting to support its position, its legal position is as wet as the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Duncan v. City of Mentor City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Ben J. v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Thieken v. ProctorOhio Court of Appeals · 2008