Legal Opinion

Ben J. v. City of Salina

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 2010No. 101,335PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Our resolution of this appeal emphasizes the requirement that a party opposing summary judgment must come forward with evidence to establish a dispute as to a material fact and must support the dispute by precisely citing to transcripts, depositions, interrogatories, admissions, affidavits, exhibits, or other supporting documents in the record. In this case, Ben and Lavelle Frick (Fricks) failed to meet these requirements when responding to the City of Salina’s (City) motion for summary judgment. Consequently, we hold that the district…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. – GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. Miller v. PreisserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Bohanon v. WerholtzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API