Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Thieken v. Proctor
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2008No. 08AP-109PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Klatt, Judge.
{¶ 1} Respondent-appellant, Gordon Proctor, Director of the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of relator-appellee, Huck Thieken. For the following reasons, we affirm.
{¶ 2} In 2001, ODOT initiated a project to improve the portion of State Route (“S.R.”) 7 that runs through Proctorville, a village situated on the Ohio River in Lawrence County. Proctorville’s business district is located on S.R. 7, now known as State Street.
{¶ 3} Huck Thieken owned a property on the northwest corner of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. OTR v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Hilliard v. First Industrial, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Dublin v. Pewamo Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011