Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2008No. 2006-1544PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandamus to compel appellant, city of Cincinnati, to institute an appropriation action. Because *132the city substantially and unreasonably interfered with a private property owner’s right of access to an abutting public road, we affirm.

Acquisition of Property

{¶ 2} In 1991, Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. (“Hilltop”) purchased approximately 30 acres of riverfront property located at 1911 and 2151 River Road in Cincinnati. Because the majority of the property is separated from River Road by two rail lines, Hilltop also purchased title to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dzina v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Turner v. HoukOhio Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State ex rel. City of Lorain v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. Croce (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. Kingsley v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State Ex Rel. Voleck v. Village of Powhatan PointOhio Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API