Hunter v. Shields
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
This is an appeal from the district court’s order to quiet title in the respondent’s property and estop the appellants from further asserting any adverse claims against the property. The appellants argue that they have a right to use an existing road under the theory of easement by prescription. We affirm the decision of the district court.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellants Denny Shields, Aleatha Shields and Timothy Shields (hereinafter collectively “the Shields”) claim a prescriptive easement over the Allen Road to access a piece of property (the “dominant estate”) in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Savage Lateral Ditch Water Users Ass'n v. PulleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- The Highlands, Inc. v. HosacIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Farrell v. BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal SavingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Benninger v. DerifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.