Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Brown

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1986No. 16095PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs, Hazel Farrell and her children, brought this action to quiet title to a tract of land along Coeur d’Alene Lake. Two principle issues are presented: (1) whether the plaintiffs are barred by res judicata from claiming ownership to the property, as a result of prior default judgments in favor of defendants’ predecessor and the defendants; and (2) whether the district court erred in finding that the plaintiffs had failed to establish an interest in the property either under a claim of adverse possession or by a prescriptive easement. We affirm the judgment.

Haze…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Aldape v. AkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Hunter v. ShieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Whitlock v. Haney Seed Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API