Legal Opinion

Savage Lateral Ditch Water Users Ass'n v. Pulley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1993No. 19616PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHILLING, Judge Pro Tem.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Respondent Last Chance Ditch Company possesses water rights in the Payette River. Its water is distributed by irrigation canals and lateral ditches, one of which is called Sand Hollow Ditch. Respondent Sand Hollow Ditch Company is responsible for maintenance of some lateral canals flowing off of Sand Hollow Ditch, including the Savage Lateral Ditch. The Savage Lateral is located near the end of Sand Hollow Ditch, not far from where Sand Hollow Ditch empties back into the Payette River.

From as early as the 1930s, the Savage Lateral…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Idaho Military Historical Society, Inc. v. MaslenIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bowles v. Pro Indiviso, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rowley v. FuhrmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API