Legal Opinion
Summey v. Tisdale
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1982No. 54525PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The dispositive issues in this appeal are: [1] Were salary recommendations made by a member of the county excise board, during the budget planning stage, sufficient to constitute an “appropriation of funds” for that purpose? [2] Did the county excise board have the discretion to reduce the salary rate proposed by principal county officers for their deputies? and [3] Did the county excise board abuse its discretion by arbitrarily reducing the proposed salary increases for deputies in the county offices? We answer the first and third questions in the negative and the second in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nixon v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Board of County Commissioners v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Rogers v. Excise Bd. of Greer CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- House of Realty, Inc. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Tulsa County Budget Board v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Morton v. Adair County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.