Legal Opinion
Nixon v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 1, 1966No. 41884PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an appeal by George Nixon, et al, County Commissioners of Caddo County, Oklahoma (defendants below) from a judgment in favor of Theodore P. Roberts, County Attorney of said county (plaintiff below) granting a writ of mandamus requiring the defendants to approve and allow claims filed with them by the Assistant County Attorney (Virgil Upchurch) on the basis and to the extent of sixty percent (60%) of the County Attorney’s salary, for services rendered by the Assistant County Attorney, beginning July 1, 1965. We will continue to refer to the parties by their trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Board of Ed. of Town of Owasso v. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Whitson v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Joachim v. Board of Education of WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Allen v. Board of Com'rs of Logan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Summey v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- McConnell v. Town Clerk of TiptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Adair County Excise Board v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Kelly v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Opinion No. (2003), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.