Legal Opinion

Tulsa County Budget Board v. Tulsa County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 2003No. 98,780PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.

T1 The issues presented are: 1) whether the defendant/appellee, Tulsa County Excise Board (Excise Board), has authority to review the budget of the plaintiff/appellant, Tulsa County Assessor (Assessor); and 2) if so, whether the Excise Board abused its discretion or acted arbitrarily or capriciously in reducing the visual inspection budget. We determine that the Excise Board may resolve funding disputes concerning the visual inspection budget. We also determine that the evidence presented does not demonstrate an abuse of discretion in the Excise Board's shift of personnel costs from the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. King v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Scott v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. DANI v. MILLERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Apache Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API