Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Stanley
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided March 18, 1991No. CV 489-254PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
ORDER
At issue in this declaratory judgment are various provisions of an insurance policy. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. There are no genuine issues of material fact, and the case is ripe for decision. As a matter of law, the Court holds that State Farm’s motion should be GRANTED and the defendant’s, DENIED.
Background
The parties do not disagree about many factual matters, only legal questions. Except as noted, the facts recited here are uncontroverted. In September 1988, Mary Ann Stanley, terminally ill with cancer, moved out of…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth DayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. J.H. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992