Legal Opinion

Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 2, 1990No. 89-7163PublishedCited by 606 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from a summary judgment for defendant. Because we conclude that plaintiffs established no more than a color-able claim of age discrimination, we affirm. We also conclude that the district court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery on a nationwide basis.

In 1985, Champion International Corporation merged with St. Regis Corporation, necessitating the consolidation and reorganization of corporate staff and employees at Champion facilities. Each facility prepared a master plan — entailing streamlined operations —…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by606 opinions

  1. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Crawford v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Damon v. Fleming Supermarkets of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Bryant v. CEO DeKalb Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Cornelius Cooper v. Southern CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

601 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API