Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Stanley

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 16, 1992No. 91-8431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

Betty and Merriam Blocker appeal the grant of State Farm’s summary judgment motion by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in State Farm’s declaratory judgment action. 773 F.Supp. 1539. Insurer, State Farm, brought this action claiming that under O.C.G.A. § 33-7-15(b) (Supp.1991) it was not obligated to defend its insured, Mary Ann Stanley, or responsible to a third party for its insured’s liability. O.C.G.A. § 33-7-15(b) relieves an insurer of its policy obligations when the insured fails to timely notify it that a covered action has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hoffman v. Allied Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Champion v. Southern General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. J.H. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API