Legal Opinion

Clements v. Rankin

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1948No. Civ. 3579PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Action to recover real estate commission. Respondent, a real estate broker, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought this action to recover from the defendants and appellants $1,300 on a claimed written agreement of defendants to pay a commission for the sale of real and personal property after the purported sale had been rescinded by the grantor and grantee by mutual consent. Since judgment was entered plaintiff died and his wife was substituted as administratrix of his estate.

Defendants owned a furnished auto court, a service station, and store equipped with certain stock and cases of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hicks v. ChristesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Massie v. ChatomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Snook v. NetherbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Herz v. Clarks MarketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Pohl v. MercurioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Hetzler v. HahlingAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API