Legal Opinion

Pohl v. Mercurio

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1949No. Civ. No. 3937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action for real estate broker’s commission and for reasonable value of services rendered.

Defendants, as partners, owned certain real property in the city of San Diego, upon which a business was conducted known as Van’s Market. On March 13, 1946, defendants by letter gave plaintiff, a real estate broker, an exclusive listing to sell the property for a net price of $50,000. It was provided in the letter that the listing would be automatically cancelled unless plaintiff had a ‘ ‘ deal in Escrow or one pending satisfactory to the writer as of March 28th, 1946.” There was a further…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Naylor v. AshtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Colton v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API