Legal Opinion

Herz v. Clarks Market

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1960No. Civ. 18614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniwat, J.

Appeal by defendant Clarks Market, a corporation, from an adverse judgment in an action to recover a broker’s commission. Appellant made a written contract with respondent broker, dated December 10, 1956, whereby the broker was ‘ ‘ employ [ed] ” for the period December 10, 1956, to February 10, 1957, “to find a purchaser for the lease” held by appellant on a market at Moraga, Contra Costa County. The contract contained a brief description of the lease and referred to certain subleases to be assigned to the purchaser. It granted respondent “the sole and irrevocable right to sell” and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Davis v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles B. Webster Real Estate v. RickardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Sullivan v. DorsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Wright v. BuzzineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API