Legal Opinion

Hetzler v. Hahling

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided May 22, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 172296Published

1Opinion of the CourtBtjrch, J.

This is an action for a real estate broker’s commission. Upon a showing that plaintiff was a licensed broker, that defendant listed for sale with plaintiff exclusively for 30 days her certain real property, and that plaintiff obtained thereunder from Mr. and Mrs. Baker a written firm offer in accordance with the terms of the listing which was accepted by defendant, the trial court granted plaintiff a summary judgment against defendant. The holding in Twogood v. Monnette, 191 Cal. 103 [215 P. 542], is to the effect that a broker employed to sell real or personal property has earned his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Walter v. LibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Arnold v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API