Legal Opinion

Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1927No. 26,096PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Upon a writ of certiorari we are asked to review an order of the industrial commission denying the relator a rehearing after a lump sum settlement approved by the commission.

The relator, an employe, was injured August . 27, 1921, by contact with high tension electric wires. Compensation was paid to October 10, 1921, when he returned to his work. On December 1, 1921, he submitted to an operation for the removal of a diseased gall bladder. About February 27, 1922, he made complaint to the commission and on March 17, 1922, a claim petition was filed and issue framed by an answer of the employer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Smith v. Independent Silo Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Zeglin v. YostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Frederickson v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Stippel v. Charles Friend & SonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Mattson v. AbateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Bomersine v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API