Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Klemer v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1916No. Nos. 19,959—(263)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Upon the relation of the partners doing business as Klemer Brothers, this court granted its writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the district court for Rice county, Childress, J., in the matter of the proceedings by relators, as employers, to fix the compensation due to Hans Wester, as employee, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The facts of the case as disclosed by the record are substantially as follows : Defendant was accidentally injured while in the employ of plaintiffs. The parties were subject to the Workmen’s Compensation statute, and recognizing their liability thereunder plaintiffs, soon after the injury, commenced paying to defendant the sum of six dollars a week, and continued the same for the period of 25 weeks. No proceedings had been brought in court to compel such payments or to otherwise require plaintiffs to compensate defendant for his injuries, and plaintiffs’ act in making the payments was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheffield v. MullinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Johnson v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Connelly v. Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Worrlein v. MaierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Troska v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API