Legal Opinion
Celentano v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 18, 1950PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
Upon a previous appeal off this case, error was found. Celentano v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 135 Conn. 16, 60 A. 2d 510. We there held that the zoning board of appeals of the city of Hartford was without power to grant to the defendant applicants a variance of the zoning ordinance unless practical difficulty or unreasonable hardship was proven. The case was remanded on the ground that there was no evidence to support a finding of either of these essentials. A new trial was had in the Court of Common Pleas. The plaintiffs had judgment sustaining their appeal from the action of the zoning…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Piccolo v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Misuk v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Plumb v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.