Misuk v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiffs own a parcel of land in Meriden and live in the house standing upon it. They appealed to the Court of Common Pleas from the action of the named defendant, hereinafter called the board, in granting a variation in the zoning regulations in favor of their next door neighbors, the defendants Abram J; and Anne White. The corut sustained the appeal, and from the judgment entered thereon all three defendants have appealed to this corut.
Tire finding is not subject to correction. It recites the following facts: Hillcrest Terrace in Meriden is a street of charming and substantial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Blake v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Benson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Daughters of St. Paul, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- James N. Barbian and Joan L. Barbian v. Constantine Panagis and the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.