Legal Opinion

Spice v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 31, 2009No. 37281-9-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

204 P.3d 254 (2009)

Ted SPICE and Plexus Development, LLC, Appellant,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY, a political subdivision, and City of Puyallup, a municipal corporation, Respondents.

No. 37281-9-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 31, 2009.

Carolyn A. Lake Goodstein Law Group PLLC Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

David Brian St. Pierre, Pierce County Office of Prosecuting Atty — Civil, Tacoma, WA, Kevin John Yamamoto, Gary Neil McLean, Puyallup, WA, for Respondents.

HUNT, J.

¶ 1 Ted Spice and Plexus Development, LLC (Spice and Plexus) appeal the superior court's denial of their CR 60(b)(5) and (11)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fay v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Chaney v. FetterlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Mellish v. Frog Mountain Pet CareCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Donald Emery v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. End The Prison Industrial Complex v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API