Legal Opinion
Chaney v. Fetterly
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 31, 2000No. 23728-8-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
995 P.2d 1284 (2000)
100 Wash.App. 140
Rick CHANEY and Julie Chaney, Appellants,
v.
Daniel FETTERLY and Lori Fetterly, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 23728-8-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
March 31, 2000.
Reconsideration Denied May 1, 2000.
Thomas J. Parkes, Tacoma, for Respondents.
John Patrick O'Connor, Shillito & Giske, Robert Eugene Mack, Smith, Alling, et al., Tacoma, for Appellants.
MORGAN, J.
The main question in this appeal is whether the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies applies when a superior court and a quasi-judicial administrative agency have concurrent…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Qwest Corp. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirwinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Qwest Corp. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirwinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.