Legal Opinion

Asche v. Bloomquist

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 2, 2006No. 32942-5-IIPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

133 P.3d 475 (2006)

132 Wash.App. 784

Richard and Helen ASCHE, individually and as a marital community, Appellants,

v.

Melany BLOOMQUIST, and Steven Chobot, individually and as a marital community; Kitsap County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; and Cindy Baker in her official capacity as Director of Kitsap County Department of Community Development, Respondents.

No. 32942-5-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 14, 2006.

As Amended April 4, 2006.

Publication Ordered May 2, 2006.

Jennifer Anne Irvine Forbes, McGavick Graves PS, Tacoma, WA, Charles Kenneth Wiggins,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wedges/ledges of California, Inc. A California Corporation v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API