Legal Opinion
Bell/Heery v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 31, 2012No. 11-462 CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (“FBOP” or the “Bureau of Prisons”) contracted to have plaintiff design and build a federal correctional institution in the state of New Hampshire. The New Hampshire state government proved resistant to plaintiffs efforts to fulfill the contract. To satisfy state officials, plaintiff was forced to incur costs it did not expect. Understandably miffed, plaintiff sued its contract partner, the United States. The United States, in turn, filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Rule…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.