Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1966No. 11451PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

The problems involved in this case are whether attorney’s fees are recoverable in a suit brought to recover on a bond executed pursuant to Art. 5160, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Civ.St., and if so what legal services may be considered in determining such fee and whether the fee allowed in this case was established as a matter of law, this being a summary judgment proceeding.

Appellee, Texas Industries Inc., also doing business as Texcrete Structural Products Company, as a subcontractor, sued Clarence H. Everett and Company, Inc., as general contractor and its surety, New Amsterdam…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Mundy v. Knutson Construction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Himes v. American Home Fence CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Akins v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Zambory v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Reynolds Research & Manufacturing Co. v. ScamardoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Parr v. FortsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Communications Transmission, Inc. v. Tristar Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API