Legal Opinion

Reynolds Research & Manufacturing Co. v. Scamardo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1967No. 4522PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

Appellant sued appellees for debt, alleging the parties had executed a written contract and an amendment thereto by which appellant was to move dirt and level the surface of appellees’ land, and for which appellees were to pay a specified sum. The suit was to recover the balance alleged to be due under the contract and its amendment, and for $377.50, alleged to be the reasonable value of certain additional work.

Appellees answered with a cross-action alleging that the contract required appellant to level and finish their land according to-Soil Conservation Service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Texas Osage Co-Op. Royalty Pool v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Webster v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Uhl v. UhlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. McFadden v. Bresler Malls, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Schecter v. FolsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Boaz Well Service, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API