Reynolds Research & Manufacturing Co. v. Scamardo
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Appellant sued appellees for debt, alleging the parties had executed a written contract and an amendment thereto by which appellant was to move dirt and level the surface of appellees’ land, and for which appellees were to pay a specified sum. The suit was to recover the balance alleged to be due under the contract and its amendment, and for $377.50, alleged to be the reasonable value of certain additional work.
Appellees answered with a cross-action alleging that the contract required appellant to level and finish their land according to-Soil Conservation Service…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Texas Osage Co-Op. Royalty Pool v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Webster v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Uhl v. UhlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- McFadden v. Bresler Malls, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Schecter v. FolsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Boaz Well Service, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.