Legal Opinion

Parr v. Fortson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 10, 1970No. 17497PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment for attorneys’ fees. The appellee Eugene B. Fortson, a practicing attorney, sued appellant in quantum meruit for a reasonable fee for legal services rendered to her, plus an additional fee under Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., Art. 2226, for his attorney. Appellee attached to his motion for summary judgment four affidavits: (1) his own in which he details the services rendered and expresses his opinion that his fee of $500 is reasonable; (2) the affidavit of Robert E. Davis, a practicing attorney, that he is familiar with the work done and that in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Habern v. Commonwealth National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Lancaster v. Wynnewood State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Estate of James v. GantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Lasater v. Franklin Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Rice v. Nu-Ray Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API