New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEAKLEY, Justice.
This is a summary judgment proceeding. Respondent furnished materials used by the contractor in the construction of certain public works at Love Field Airport of the City of Dallas. Its claim therefor being unpaid, Respondent sued Clarence H. Everett & Co. Inc., the contractor to whom the materials were furnished, and Petitioner, the surety for the contractor on the payment bond executed pursuant to Article 5160, 1 commonly known as the McGregor Act. The trial court entered a joint and several summary judgment against the contractor and surety for the principal sum of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Zandt v. Fort Worth PressTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- WM. Cameron & Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Mundy v. Knutson Construction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- F. & C. ENGINEERING CO. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. McCullough Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by250 opinions
- Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development & Research Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. LowTexas Supreme Court · 2002
245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.