Legal Opinion

Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1990No. 16595PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by claimant from an order of the Industrial Commission which modified a previous award. The Commission had originally held that claimant was totally and permanently disabled, and its order of modification awarded only 55 percent total and permanent disability. We affirm.

On November 12, 1980, claimant was injured while employed by Bunker Hill as an underground miner. There was no question but that claimant’s employment was covered by workmen’s compensation. *791Bunker Hill is a self-insured employer. Claimant had been an employee of Bunker Hill for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sines v. AppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Graham v. Larry Donohoe LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Nigherbon v. Ralph E. Feller Trucking, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Gravatt v. Regence BlueshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Long v. HendricksIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Long v. HendricksIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API