Legal Opinion

Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2010No. 34696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This matter comes before this Court on an appeal from the Industrial Commission’s (“the Commission”) order entered on remand from the case of Frank v. Bunker Hill Co., 142 Idaho 126, 124 P.3d 1002 (2005). On appeal Paul Frank argues that the Commission erred in failing to award him reimbursement for the cost of past and future medical insurance, which he claims is required to pay for his medical expenses incurred as the result of his industrial injury. Frank also appeals the denial of attorney fees for the proceedings held before the Commission. We affirm the Commission.

I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bream v. BenscoterIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wheeler v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Giltner, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Commerce & LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alpha Mortgage Fund v. DrinkardIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  2. GSN Capital, LLC v. Shoshone City & Rural Fire DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API