Legal Opinion

Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2005No. 30719PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

The appellant, Paul E. Frank, sought to reopen his disability claim, which arose from a mining injury he sustained in 1980. Frank appeals from the Industrial Commission’s dismissal based on statute of limitations grounds.

I

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Frank was injured in a mining incident in November 1980 while employed by the Bunker Hill Company (Bunker Hill). He filed a worker’s compensation claim and was awarded total permanent disability in July 1984. Upon rehearing requested by Bunker Hill, the Commission modified its order in 1986, reducing the award to 55% total and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodvine v. Triangle Dairy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Painter v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Snyder v. Burl C. Lange, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Reynolds v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Steinebach v. Hoff Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bates v. SeldinIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Huff v. SingletonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Stolle v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Christensen v. S.L. Start & Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API