State v. Underwood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
In this jurisdiction the rule is well established that a warrant may be quashed only for its failure to charge a crime or a lack of jurisdiction of the court to try the case — defects which appear on the face of the record. In ruling upon a motion to quash the judge rules only upon a question of law. He is not permitted to consider “extraneous evidence,” that is, the testimony of witnesses or documents other than the specific statutes or ordinances involved. “Therefore, when the defect must be established by evidence aliunde the record, the motion must be denied.” State v.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- High Point Surplus Company v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.