Legal Opinion

State v. Blackwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 2006No. 490PA04-2PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

In Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S.-, 165 L. Ed. 2d 466 (2006), the United States Supreme Court concluded that error under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), was subject to federal harmless error analysis. We therefore review the Blakely violation which occurred at defendant’s second trial for harmlessness. We also address defendant’s argument that federal Blakely error violates the Constitution of North Carolina (the State Constitution). We conclude that the trial court’s finding of an aggravating factor at defendant’s second trial was harmless beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. State v. OglesbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. HurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. LasiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. ThomsenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API