Legal Opinion
Henriquez v. Allegre
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 19, 2002No. AC 21527PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN J.
The plaintiff, Max Henriquez, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the *239granting of the defendant’s motion to dismiss. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that his action, commenced pursuant to General Statutes § 52-592,1 was untimely. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of the appeal. In January, 1997, the plaintiff commenced a timely action against the defendant, Jose F. Allegre, for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Coppola v. CoppolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Ross Realty Corp. v. SurkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hersey v. Lonrho, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tellar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Stevenson v. Peerless Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Webster Bank v. ZakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.