Legal Opinion
Babes v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1998No. SC 15887PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
In accordance with Practice Book § 73-1 and General Statutes § 52-235 (a), the trial court granted the parties’ joint interlocutory motion for reservation of a question of law to the Appellate Court. We subsequently transferred the reserved question to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 65-1 and General Statutes § 51-199 (c). The issue framed by the parties and reserved by the trial court for advice is: “When the [s]tate is sued pursuant to its waiver of sovereign immunity in [General Statutes] § 52-556,1 is it immune from a reallocation of damages pursuant to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Donner v. KearseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Card v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.