Legal Opinion
Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1978No. 76 Civ. 4395PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, owner and lessee respectively of real property in the City of New Rochelle, seek damages from the defendant New York State Thru way Authority (“Authority”) for injuries resulting from the discharge onto plaintiffs’ property of oil, sand, debris and chemicals from a drain constructed by the defendant on adjacent lands. In addition to damages, plaintiffs seek permanent injunctive relief against a continuation of such conduct.
Plaintiffs allege various causes of action: 1(1) The defendant’s conduct constitutes a taking of property without due…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Cartagena v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Collier v. City of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Archer Gardens, Ltd. v. Brooklyn Center Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.