Archer Gardens, Ltd. v. Brooklyn Center Development Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
Archer Gardens, Ltd. and Podgel Associates, Ltd. (“plaintiffs”) own properties in an area in Brooklyn, New York, which has been designated for urban renewal. Their amended complaint in this action alleges a de facto appropriation of their properties and seeks compensation therefor. Defendants are the City of New York (“the City”) and Brooklyn Center Development Corporation (“Development”), a private corporation. 1 Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a) and 1983, and the latter’s jurisdictional counterpart, section 1343, and under the doctrine of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Potomac Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rios v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Lauro v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Ward v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.