Legal Opinion
Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1980No. 76 Civ. 4395PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, owner and lessee respectively of real property in the City of New Rochelle (the “City”) seek damages from the City for injuries resulting from the discharge onto their property of drainage carried from City streets through a drain constructed by the defendant on land adjacent to plaintiffs’ property. In addition, plaintiffs seek permanent injunctive relief against a continuation of such conduct.
This action is the latest in a series of efforts by the plaintiffs to secure the requested relief. Initially, they filed a complaint in this Court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Secombe v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frooks v. Town of CortlandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Nika Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- In re Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- HBP ASSOCIATES v. MarshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Vaizburd v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.