Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Urban Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1963No. Appeals, 19 and 20PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

These appeals involve two actions in equity, instituted by the respective appellants against the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh [Authority] and the City of Pittsburgh [City]. Appellant Schwartz, as trustee for a corporation to be formed, and appellant Shapero, in his own behalf as a taxpayer and in behalf of other taxpayers of the City, filed complaints in equity seeking: 1. to enjoin the Authority and the City “from taking any action to sell, grant, convey, lease, mortgage, encumber, pledge or in any manner dispose of or attempt to dispose of” a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Keystone Raceway Corp. v. State Harness Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Eways v. Reading Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Wilson v. Howard Johns RestaurantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Faden v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API