Legal Opinion

Price v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1966No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

In May 1964, appellants, B. Price and Barook Masuda, instituted an action in equity to enjoin appellee, the Philadelphia Parking Authority, from proceeding under separate negotiated agreements for the development of two projects, hereafter referred to as the Academy House Project and the Rittenhouse Square Project, and to have such agreements declared null and void.

*320The Philadelphia Parking Authority is “a public body corporate and politic, exercising public powers,”1 created by the City of Philadelphia pursuant to enabling legislation2 for the purpose of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Rocks v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API