Price v. Philadelphia Parking Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
In May 1964, appellants, B. Price and Barook Masuda, instituted an action in equity to enjoin appellee, the Philadelphia Parking Authority, from proceeding under separate negotiated agreements for the development of two projects, hereafter referred to as the Academy House Project and the Rittenhouse Square Project, and to have such agreements declared null and void.
*320The Philadelphia Parking Authority is “a public body corporate and politic, exercising public powers,”1 created by the City of Philadelphia pursuant to enabling legislation2 for the purpose of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rocks v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.