Marr v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
This opinion covers the three above-en-ticled cases. They all involve the same le.gal question. For convenience of exposition, all references in the opinion will be to the case of Retta A. Marr, Administra-trix, as if that were the only case under consideration.
The plaintiff’s intestate was employed by the Alaska Road Commission during the period January 1, 1935, to March 5, 1945, He presented a claim to the Comptroller General for overtime pay to which he claimed to be entitled pursuant to Section 23 of the Act of March 28, 1934, 5 U.S. C.A. § 673c. The claim was referred to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. TownsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McKnight v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1877
- L. E. Myers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- Poggas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Turner Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.