Legal Opinion

Marr v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1952No. 50102, 50015, 50032, 50102PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

This opinion covers the three above-en-ticled cases. They all involve the same le.gal question. For convenience of exposition, all references in the opinion will be to the case of Retta A. Marr, Administra-trix, as if that were the only case under consideration.

The plaintiff’s intestate was employed by the Alaska Road Commission during the period January 1, 1935, to March 5, 1945, He presented a claim to the Comptroller General for overtime pay to which he claimed to be entitled pursuant to Section 23 of the Act of March 28, 1934, 5 U.S. C.A. § 673c. The claim was referred to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. TownsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. McKnight v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1877
  4. L. E. Myers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Poggas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Turner Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API