Legal Opinion

Andrews v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1953No. 73-53PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

Each of the plaintiffs was an employee of the Alaska Eoad Commission whose rate of pay was set by a wage board. Each presented to the Comptroller General of the. United States a claim for overtime pay to which he claimed he was entitled under Section 23 of the Act of March 28, 1934, 48 Stat. 522. The Comptroller General, after consideration of the claims, sent each of the plaintiffs a “Notice of. Settlement of Claims,” stating a specified sum to which, the. Comptroller General had concluded, the claimant was entitled. None of the claims were paid, because there was no appropriated money…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Textile MacHine Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. FarwellUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Elliott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Albin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. DerecktorUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API