Legal Opinion

Walker v. Etcheverry

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1941No. Civ. 2538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLETTE, J., pro tem.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs and respondents Thomas E. Walker, Leon Walker, and Clara Mae Walker, minors, by and through their mother, Roxie Walker, now Roxie Coree, as guardian ad litem, to recover for the death of their father, Thomas W. Walker, through the alleged negligence of Filbert Joe Etcheverry and Mariana Etcheverry, defendants and appellants. An amended complaint was filed by plaintiffs, to which a general demurrer was interposed by defendants. This demurrer being overruled, an answer to the amended complaint was duly filed. The case was then…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Girard v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Daubert v. Western Meat Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Union Oil Co. v. DomengeauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. House v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Perkins v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Helling v. LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Driskill v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Oliver v. BoxleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API