House v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, P. J. —
In this action by plaintiffs, husband and wife, against the Pacific Greyhound Lines, a common carrier, for the alleged wrongful death of their son, Carl James House, it is alleged that Carl James House, a young man eighteen years of age, lost his life while a fare-paying -passenger on a bus of the Greyhound Lines through its negligence, and that plaintiffs have been damaged therebj^. By an amended answer defendant denied the identity of the deceased, the damages sustained and that as to Sarnie G. House the complaint failed to state a cause of action, and that the court had no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Work v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Rowe v. RennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Speck v. SarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Barnett. v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hunton v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.