Legal Opinion
City of Duncan v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1928No. 18392PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, Y. C. J.
In this case, tfie defendant in error, Louvisa Stanley, brought suit against tfie plaintiff in error, city of Duncan, because of alleged damages to her real property located near said city, by reason of tfi’e construction and operation of a sanitary sewer system and disposal plant.
It appears tfiat a small stream flows through said city and across tfie farm of the plaintiff, which is located about a mile from tfi’e city; tfiat about the year 1911, the city constructed a sanitary sewer system and septic plant which emptied into said stream near tfie city boundary; that this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- City of Tulsa v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- City of Mangum v. Sun Set FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Consumers Light Power Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herwig v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Tulsa v. Springfield Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Carter Oil Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931