Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. West

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1931No. 21070Published

1Opinion

Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing.

SWINDALL, J.

In the opinion in this case it was carefully pointed out that we were considering only a nuisance caused by the discharge of unpurified sewage into a watercourse, and we took judicial notice of the fact that sewage can be easily and successfully purified by modern methods. Having so concluded, we held it to naturally follow that the nuisance was to be held temporary, for it could be abated by the expenditure of money or labor.

We refused to follow the contention that we should look backwards to ascertain why it was that the sewage was not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. McLaughlin v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Winn v. Village of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API