Legal Opinion

Consumers Light Power Co. v. Holland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1926No. 16231PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was commenced by the defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, in the district court of Carter county on the 16th day of May, 1923, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, to recover damages consisting of the alleged depreciation in the value of certain property owned and occupied by the plaintiff during a period of two years next preceding the institution of the action, and for annoyance, discomfort, and inconvenience because of the construction and operation by the defendant of a spray pond.

There were two causes of action incorporated in plaintiff's…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. City of Mangum v. Sun Set FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Big Four Foundry Co. v. HagensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. City of Duncan v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. City of Skiatook v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API